Forensic Expertise Area: Forensic Chemistry, Instrumental Analysis
As of August 2020, 125 countries and territories have reported the appearance of over 1000 individual New Psychoactive Substances (NPS) since monitoring began in 2008.1 This ever-changing NPS landscape has resulted in many analytical challenges for forensic drug chemists. Frequently, NPS are introduced to the scene whose chemical structures only differ from existing drugs of abuse by the addition, subtraction, or relocation, of a single chemical moiety. Substances that share the same molecular formula and core structural backbone but only differ in the precise placement of a single atom or functional group are considered positional isomers2, and they can be difficult to differentiate using a typical forensic analytical scheme.3 Depending on the jurisdiction, positional isomers of controlled substances are not always covered under existing legislation,4-7 making the ability to distinguish them of utmost importance.
To combat this problem, a substantial amount of research has been conducted in recent years to identify new and improved methods of positional isomer differentiation. Some methods suggested include statistical analysis of data generated from typical forensic instrumentation,8-9, alternative sample preparation by derivatization,10 as well as the application of instrumentation that is not currently commonly used by the typical forensic drug laboratory.11-13
The aim of this literature thesis is to explore the research that has been conducted to address the challenge of positional isomer differentiation in order to summarize the options currently available for forensic drug laboratories.
- Basic understanding in forensic chemistry. Familiarity with analytical instrumentation and data analysis is recommended.
|Virginia Department of Forensic Science|
|Supervisor :||Jennifer Bonetti|
|UvA Co-assessor:||Arian van Asten|
|UVA Coordinator:||Arian van Asten|