In the Netherlands Bloodstain Pattern Analysis is evolving as experts are reporting using activity level propositions. However, determining the probability of the outcome given two competing propositions cannot yet be based on (hard/published) data, simple due to lack in research. While evaluation of multiple propositions with Bayesian Statistics in BPA preferable requires a scientific basis. A scientific basis which for these kinds of calculations in BPA is almost non-existent and sometimes obscure. This literature investigation will focus on collecting and comparing existing data and research to try to find what kind of scientific research is required to further this kind of reporting.
The Netherlands Register of Court Experts (NRGD) will soon (or has recently) opened the field of BPA for registration of experts. One of its goals is to improve quality of experts and reports where possible. Therefor this project will be a joined effort between the NRGD and the NFI.
Institute/ Company: NRGD (Netherlands Register of Court Experts) and NFI (Dutch Forensic Institute)
Department: Humaan Biologische Sporen - Plaats Delict Onderzoek
Country: The Netherlands
Supervisor: Nick Laan, Mikle van der Scheer
Uva Examiner: t.b.d.
Uva Coordinator: Arian van Asten/ Yorike Hartman
Date of publication: September 26, 2025